A day in the tunnel is an extremely productive and rewarding few hours, and I can't recommend Simon Smart and VeloScience highly enough. The gains in speed we found in just four
hours of tunnel time equate to one or even two season's worth of fitness gains for a top rider. Even more extraordinary is that this was with experienced athletes who were already
meticulous about their equipment, position and preparation - riders who at face value had very little more to find.
With the wealth of accessible information as to the most aerodynamic wheels, frames, and bars on the market, the rider can get left out of the equation. But, this is where the vast
majority of the gains are to be made. It is only by being in the wind tunnel with the whole package of rider and bike can that these gains really be discovered. There are some key
principles to guide the optimisation process - narrower or wider, lower or higher, forward or backward; but ultimately, if it's fast, it's fast. And, I'm particularly appealed by the organic
nature by which this is determined for each athlete - Simon has a keen eye for speed and his experience at the highest level in both with cycling and motor racing allows him to quickly
spot where and how the gains can be made.
The amusing thing is that what looks aero is not necessarily so. What looks lumpy and ugly can sometimes be better! But, the numbers coming off the strain gauges don't lie. So long as
the drag coefficient is reduced, we're in business. In fact, the precision of the wind tunnel is much better than I ever imagined it would be. To take a rider and his bike back to the tunnel
6 months later and repeat the exact same trial to within a quarter of one percent accuracy is remarkable sensitivity (less than 1 W difference in power requirement at 30 mph). So, even
tiny changes like a change in hand position or a different skinsuit fabric can be detected, and they really do all add up to a sizeable improvement.
A fast position is only as good as being a powerful position, and this is where the benefits of having a rolling road in the tunnel really come to the fore. No longer is it a conflict of
sacrificing comfort and power for speed. It's all about finding the most powerful position and then tweaking it to make it the fastest. That can't be done on a computer - it has to be done
in real life in the tunnel. It's testimony to the value of the process that the optimal positions we ended up with in the tunnel were ridden to victories on the road within the very same week.
Our understanding of the physics and physiology of cycle racing has progressed to the point that we can predict race performance on the track and even on the open road to a surprisingly
high level of accuracy. The first domestic time trial championship of 2008, the National 10, was won by two riders fresh out of the wind tunnel. Their finishing times, Championship records
for men and women respectively and the two second fastest ever in open events in the UK, were both within 4 s (0.3% in a 18 to 20 min race) of our pre-race predictions, and this process
was driven largely by the knowledge of their exact drag co-efficient. Some might think putting such numbers to things removes the mysterious magic out of racing, but in fact, it can
actually be very empowering to the rider - they know they are on the start-line as best prepared as they could ever be. And for me, a physiologist playing the role of coach, it allows us to
guide their racing effort to an exact plan, knowing that it is taking them to the very edge of their ability. They can get on with the hard bit - the riding - confident they have the best form
and the best set-up they've ever had.
Your winning margin might be measured in minutes or in seconds, and whilst it's not exactly free speed, for the sake of an afternoon spent in the wind tunnel every so often, it's the
nearest thing to it. If you don't come out of the wind tunnel more aero than when you go in, then I think Simon should give you your money back. I don't expect he'll be handing out any
refunds soon.